Aaron Shields’s Mind Terroir

Branding, Neuroscience, Innovation, and a Taste of Wine

Aaron Shields’s Mind Terroir header image 4

Twitter Me This

August 6th, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

A study conducted by the Harvard Business School released in June examined the habits of Twitter users. The researchers concluded:

In other words, the pattern of contributions on Twitter is more concentrated among the few top users than is the case on Wikipedia, even though Wikipedia is clearly not a communications tool. This implies that Twitter’s resembles more of a one-way, one-to-many publishing service more than a two-way, peer-to-peer communication network.

The conclusion of this study highlights an important issue: most social media isn’t social. Despite claims of trying to involve the customers, the majority of social media is composed attempts at trying to find new media in which to broadcast messages, because marketers believe that their old media are no longer as effective.

But, it doesn’t matter where you put your message if people don’t care. Just because Twitter is hip, it doesn’t mean people will pay attention if you have nothing to really offer them other than a pitch for your goods and services.

Instead of using Twitter to sell, sell, sell, think about how you can use it to get in tune with your customers and find out what they really want from you.

Tags:   · · · · · No Comments.

Meeting Unmet Needs

August 5th, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

Abraham Maslow believed that of all endeavors, business had the greatest potential to result in mass, positive psychological change.

I was reminded why this is true reading a comment on a CNN blog post about the G.I. Joe movie. Chad Halvorsen writes:

Where the hell is shipwreck and why does Hollywood want to ruin my childhood.? My adult life is a terrible waste but my childhood actually meant something.

For Chad, G.I. Joe is more than just a product. At their best, brands develop mutually beneficial relationships with their customers by fulfilling their unmet human needs. For many, brands can supply what society cannot.

What is your brand doing for its customers?

Tags:   · · · No Comments.

Operant Marketing

August 4th, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

The purpose of business hasn’t changed since your company started and it’s never going to change; in Peter Drucker’s words, “There is only one valid definition of business purpose: to create a customer.” And, at some point in the past, you developed a marketing strategy to create customers, and your marketing tactics worked well and they became standard practice.

Even though business purpose hasn’t changed, the business environment has; and, you’ve probably realized it. In 2006, Verizon’s Chief Marketing Office, John Stratton, lashed out against marketing agencies: “Your clients are in trouble. They are looking to you to save them. The ad inventory that has been sold for the last 50 years no longer works, and marketers have started to figure that out. In the process, your clients will fire, hire, fire and hire agency after agency… seeking someone—anyone—who can help them perhaps on where to go next … Last year I spent well over a billion dollars buying space, time, air, hits and clicks across a multitude of mediums … So if you’ve been selling me this stuff, you probably need to know that I’m not perfectly happy. And I’m not alone.”

You’ve recognized that the environment has changed, but when was the last time you changed your marketing strategy? When was the last time you even considered changing your marketing strategy?

I don’t mean small year-to-year changes; I mean changing your whole approach.
Chances are you probably haven’t, and you shouldn’t—your brain isn’t wired to make the change: since your marketing strategy worked at some point, it became a learned behavior—you unknowingly engaged in operant conditioning.

Operant conditioning is a type of learning wherein you learn voluntary behavior based on the presentation or removal of positive or aversive stimuli. If your marketing tactics, your voluntary behavior, worked continually in the past you consistently received a positive stimulus—profits, increased awareness, etc. Through this positive reinforcement you learned to engage in the same behavior and expect the same results. And, that probably happened for years if not decades.

You’re tactics are probably still getting some “results,” but they’re not as effective as they were. But, since you have been conditioned to engage in the same behavior, knowing that you’ll get some results is better than not knowing if you’ll get any. If a rat learns to push a lever and get food every time, but suddenly he only gets food every other time he pushes the lever, he’s still going to push the lever even though the positive nature of the response has been halved.

Change is hard; it’s scary. It’s the path less trodden. But, eventually when the effectiveness of your strategy gets too low—if the rat only gets food every 100 times he pushes the lever—you’re going to be forced to change. And realistically, is this day that far in the future?

So maybe now is the time to play the “If” game: if you had to change everything about your marketing strategy, what would you do?

While you’re playing, it may be helpful to keep some other sagacious words from Drucker in mind to guide your new marketing strategy: “The aim of marketing is to make selling superfluous. The aim of marketing is to know and understand the customer so well that the product or service fits him and sells itself. Ideally, marketing should result in a customer who is ready to buy.”

Stand up, take a deep breath, say goodbye to your lever, and go play.

Tags:   · · · No Comments.

Service in the Sky

July 30th, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

Pop Quiz: Guess The Airline From The Following Clues

The CEO of this airline believed that aside from safety, the way to build an airline is through great service. He also insisted on giving all employees the best training in the industry.

Is the airline:
A: United
B: Southwest
C: American
D: Delta

If you guessed C, American, you’re correct.

During the mid 30s to late 60s, CEO CR Smith built the most respected airline in the business. Just like Sam Walton, CR Smith would fly around the country to get acquainted with all employees and become intimate with the details of his airline.

If you guessed Southwest, don’t feel bad, they picked up where American left off.  Southwest has built a great business using the same philosophy that made American great during the reign of Smith. Yet, despite the success of American’s plan, future CEOs strayed and turned American into just another airline.

Focusing on customer service is a key ingredient of success. And the key to creating great customer service is making sure employees are empowered and happy. It worked for American, it’s working for Southwest, and it will work for you.

Tags:   · · · No Comments.

Putting The Customer First

July 22nd, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

How far are you willing to go to help your customers get what they want?

Zappos will check other retailers for a customer if the merchandise is out of stock and refer them to a competitor. You can be sure that customer will come back to Zappos again and tell all her friends, because Zappos always makes sure she gets what she needs.

In Quest for the Best, Stanley Marcus, the former chairman of Neiman Marcus, descrbes an encounter with a customer he ran into at the symphony: The customer told Marcus that his pipe stem broke, but that Neiman Marcus was not getting anymore for 3 months. The next day Marcus called the buyer, found out that was untrue. When the man got to his office, he found a message that Neiman Marcus was delivering a replacement by noon.

A month later the man purchased a $50,000 diamond ring.

Exceeding customers’ expectations by delivering great service reaps great rewards.

How far do you go to meet and exceed your customers’ needs?

Tags:   · · · · No Comments.

TED Week: Robert Full and The New Rennaisance Man

July 16th, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

Leon Battista Alberti summed up the ideals of the Renaissance and the notion of the Renaissance man with the phrase, “A man can do all things if he but wills them.”

But, since the Renaissance knowledge has become extremely specialized, and the idea of becoming a Da-Vinci-like dominant force in multiple endeavors is seemingly impossible.

The ideals of the Renaissance are being reformulated so that ability to combine different disciplines and achieve creative solutions exists not in an individual but within the collective knowledge and dynamics of a group.

Biologist Robert Full shares how the disciplines of biology and robotics can be combined to create robots that move in ingenious ways.

Tags:   · · · · · · No Comments.

TED Week: Ken Robinson and Changing Education for Creativity

July 14th, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

One of the most fun talks to watch on TED is also one of my favorites: “Ken Robinson says schools kill creativity.”

Despite being laden with humor, Robinson’s message is an important one: schools need to encourage forms of learning that go beyond a very specific focus on math and science and a narrow way of testing skills if society is to prepare children to reach their full potentials and lead happy lives.

I also urge you to check out both of Ken Robinson’s books: Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative, an elaboration of Robinson’s argument proposed in this video, and The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything, which describes the importance of finding what you’re passionate about and doing it.

Tags:   · · · No Comments.

Why Targeting Influentials Doesn’t Work

July 13th, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

I’ve been a fan of Duncan Watts work since I read his Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. Last night on Twitter, thanks to Michale B. Moore and Steve Jennings, I discovered an article from Fast Company published last year. The article examines Watts’s take on debunking the Influentials theory.

The Influentials theory, made popular to current generations by Malcolm Gladwell in The Tipping Point, and Jon Berry and Ed Keller in The Influentials, has become the darling of many in the marketing world. The idea is simple: to create a viral spread marketers should target a magical, rare group of individuals who exert a disproportionate amount of influence on a large group of people.

I’ve never been a fan of this theory, or more appropriately hypothesis. Those touting the validity of the idea of Influentials offer little insight into how the spread works and, more importantly, how you can find and target them in the first place. Their suggestions are more flowery and inspiring than practical and useful.

Duncan Watts is of the same opinion. In a 2001 experiment, reproducing the famous 1967  Six Degrees of Separation study by Stanley Milgram on a larger scale, Watts found that only 5% of the message passed through the highly connected individuals to reach the final target.

Perhaps the most important conclusion from the original Milgram paper (and I never see this mentioned) is that information, even if you know an exact target, has a tendency to get trapped:  in Milgram’s study only 29% of the packages made it to the target.

This begs the question: if it’s hard to make sure a known, specific target gets reached, how is it possible to ensure that members of an ill-defined group of “Influentials” get your message?

Using computer simulations to model social behavior, Watts notes: “If society is ready to embrace a trend, almost anyone can start one—and if it isn’t, then almost no one can.”

In other words, the most important factor in creating a viral movement isn’t reaching highly connected people, it’s the willingness of a group in a society to accept the trend.

This is why it’s important to make sure your advertising targets a mindset rather than an individual. If the mindset you’re targeting results in a strong emotional hook, people will naturally be drawn to support it and champion its benefits.

Watts’s final conclusion is that the best way to create a viral spread of information is by way of mass marketing:  the more people you reach, the more likely it is that the message will spread.

I’d modify Watts’s last point: target as many media channels as possible that are likely to contain members who have a mindset receptive to your message. And, this is closer to Watts’s main point: the likelihood of a message being passed on has the most to do with how receptive people are to it.

To sum up, :

  1. Information is likely to get trapped. Targeting an ill-defined group of Influentials won’t work.

  2. The most important factor in whether or not something gets spread is how receptive people are to the message.

  3. Focus broadcasting the message in channels likely to have individuals with a similar mindset.

Tags:   · · · · · · 1 Comment

TED Week: Jill Bolte Taylor and Accessing the Creative Impulse

July 13th, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

Every day this week, I’m going to draw attention to a different video from TED that is related to branding or innovation. If you’ve never experienced the wealth of insights that TED offers, I urge you to check it out.

To kick things off, I’m starting with the most popular TED video of all time: Jill Bolte Taylor’s “My stroke of insight.”

Taylor’s video takes the viewer on a journey of what it was like for a neuroanatomist to experience her own stroke.

The valuable message Jill Bolte Taylor shares for all of us involved in creative work is that we have the choice to access the parts of our minds that we tend to ignore.

I hope you enjoy, and find inspiration in her talk.

Tags:   · · · 4 Comments

Preparing Students For An Uncertain Future

July 13th, 2009 by Aaron Shields
Respond

The 2008 Did You Know 3.0 posted on YouTube (see Below) has an interesting, but unsurprising considering the pace of the world’s change, fact 00:51 into it: the top ten in demand jobs in 2010 did not exist in 2004.

Hopefully this is something educators will soon take note of and rethink the way our schools systems develop education programs. Rather than teach and reward memorization for the sake of memorization in an isolated fashion, i.e., monodisciplinary rather than interdisciplinary, students should be prepared to learn the skill that will be the most valuable asset in the coming decades: how to think creatively.

As James Watson, co-discover of the structure of DNA and winner of the Nobel Prize, writes in Avoid Boring People, “College [and by extension all the schooling that came before it] is for learning how to think.”

Thinking creatively involves the ability to associate ideas, and, in its most useful form, the ability to associate ideas from different disciplines.

Education systems must begin to take a cross-disciplinary approach in order to prepare students for an innovation-based future, as preparing students to learn how to think is the only sensible course of action in an unknown future.

Tags:   · · · 1 Comment